Corporate sale of IT companies

Successful­ly selling IT companies

How does a compa­ny sale of IT compa­nies become successful? Digital entre­pre­neurs ask themsel­ves this questi­on far earlier than other SMEs. Our expert Ingo Claus spoke to iBusi­ness about what makes a successful corpo­ra­te sale of IT companies. 

Given the current econo­mic situa­ti­on, is it worth selling your own business? 

The general econo­mic condi­ti­ons for business succes­si­on are extre­me­ly good at the moment: low interest rates make for a favoura­ble finan­cing environ­ment. In additi­on, the baby boomers of the Federal Republic of Germa­ny are slowly thinking about their own retire­ment. Some of them have founded very successful compa­nies or taken them over from their parents’ generation.

Many of these entre­pre­neurs face the chall­enge of passing on a family business to the next genera­ti­on. Accor­ding to a study by the IFM (Insti­tut für Mittel­stands­for­schung), only around 13% of all family businesses succeed in the transi­ti­on to the third genera­ti­on. There are many reasons for this: child­ren more often set other profes­sio­nal priori­ties than their parents or do not want to take on the respon­si­bi­li­ty of an entre­pre­neur. And someti­mes entre­pre­neurs simply do not have children.

The number of succes­sor compa­nies is more likely to increase than decrease in the future. Due to the good current macroe­co­no­mic frame­work condi­ti­ons, Germa­ny is even more likely to see a Lack of entre­pre­neurs confronted.

What are the most common reasons for selling IT companies?

These reasons for a sale can be very diffe­rent. One of the main reasons for a compa­ny sale of IT compa­nies is to secure the growth of the compa­ny. Especi­al­ly the sale to a strate­gic inves­tor creates syner­gies or brings the neces­sa­ry know-how to create an additio­nal compe­ti­ti­ve advantage.

Skills shorta­ge drives compa­ny sales in the IT sector

The German The IT sector is current­ly in a state of flux. The shorta­ge of skilled workers means that many compa­nies can only grow very slowly under their own steam. This is certain­ly not optimal for the indus­try, which is charac­te­ri­sed by speed.

Especi­al­ly in low-margin segments of the inter­net indus­try and software develo­p­ment, a conso­li­da­ti­on process has been taking place for some time. In this process, interes­t­ing but low-profit compa­nies are taken over by larger compa­nies and thus become more profi­ta­ble. The same appli­es to IT system houses that sell holistic hardware and software soluti­ons. Integra­ted into a larger struc­tu­re, signi­fi­cant syner­gies can often be achieved.

A second major reason for compa­ny acqui­si­ti­ons is certain­ly that strate­gi­cal­ly positio­ned IT compa­nies are always ready to take over innova­ti­ve compe­ti­tors. This expands their own know-how and custo­mer base.

In the future, we will also see one or the other age succes­si­on in the IT indus­try. These are often compa­nies founded in the late nineties whose owners are turning to new perspec­ti­ves after their working lives.

What options and strate­gies are there for owners who are thinking about selling their business?

Charac­te­ristic for SMEs is the emotio­nal bond of compa­ny owners with their compa­ny. Our daily work shows that one’s own feelings are often the biggest hurdle for the trans­fer­or of a compa­ny. The compa­ny owner should there­fo­re first ask himself: Am I really ready to part with my compa­ny? Do I have a new vision that I am really looking forward to reali­sing? Do I need a clear ‘cut’ with all the conse­quen­ces, or do I prefer a slow separa­ti­on in prede­fi­ned steps? Only after clari­fy­ing these important questi­ons can a concre­te strategy be developed.

Good prepa­ra­ti­on supports the sale of IT companies

A compa­ny succes­si­on is similar­ly complex as a founda­ti­on and thus has to be prepared and managed as a strate­gic project. Under no circum­s­tances should entre­pre­neurs succumb to the miscon­cep­ti­on that a compa­ny sale can be handled along­side every­day business. A compa­ny sale should be planned as precis­e­ly as a large invest­ment. From the buyer’s point of view, a compa­ny purcha­se is always an invest­ment that he decides on together with his finan­ciers on the basis of future expectations.

Perso­nal­ly, I am always surpri­sed how little atten­ti­on sellers pay to the prepa­ra­ti­on of a compa­ny sale. This is all the more astonis­hing becau­se the course for the success of the project is alrea­dy set in this early phase. Good sales prepa­ra­ti­on can be compared to a good business plan and alrea­dy answers many questi­ons that an acqui­rer may have about the compa­ny and its market positi­on as well as the figures.

Whether the compa­ny is then sold in full or only in part, whether the transac­tion is struc­tu­red as an asset deal or a share deal and whether the owner of the compa­ny is retai­ned in the future must then be decided in each case depen­ding on the project. Each project is diffe­rent. It is there­fo­re impos­si­ble to recom­mend a general strategy.

What are the strate­gies for selling IT companies?

This depends entire­ly on the compa­ny. The speci­fic know-how of a techno­lo­gy provi­der is interes­t­ing for many strate­gic inves­tors. In contrast, the custo­mer base or market access often plays an important role for online shops or digital agenci­es. Ultim­ate­ly, the right strategy for selling IT compa­nies can only be develo­ped in the concre­te project.

In many cases, the former owners remain with the compa­ny after the sale. When does that make sense?

Often owners can make a signi­fi­cant contri­bu­ti­on to the company’s success with their networks and speci­fic know-how even after the sale. For this reason, a soft transi­ti­on can make perfect sense. This is often the case for young growth-orien­ted compa­nies that want to lay the founda­ti­on for a positi­ve compa­ny develo­p­ment in the future through a sale or a signi­fi­cant investment.

Dual leader­ship tends to lead to problems

In the case of pure age succes­si­on, a long paral­lel opera­ti­on is rather criti­cal. Employees want a clear contact person. A dual leader­ship consis­ting of ‘old’ and ’new’ usual­ly leads to very practi­cal commu­ni­ca­ti­on problems between manage­ment and staff or to conflicts within the compa­ny. Thus, dual leader­ship can have a signi­fi­cant negati­ve impact on the company’s success. In such cases, dual leader­ship is recom­men­ded for a relatively short transi­tio­nal period of a few months. Ultim­ate­ly, most compa­nies can be compared to a ship: On board there needs to be a captain who takes command and respon­si­bi­li­ty with clear decisions.

How long should a boss conti­nue to accom­pa­ny his compa­ny as an employee after the sale? When is it time to leave for good?

This depends entire­ly on the transac­tion: If compa­nies are very depen­dent on the perso­na­li­ty of the owner, it makes sense that they remain with the compa­ny in the long term. This can be done, for examp­le, through consul­tancy agree­ments or the appoint­ment of an adviso­ry board. In practi­ce, we see adviso­ry boards in parti­cu­lar as very cost-effici­ent and effec­ti­ve instru­ments for the strate­gic develo­p­ment of a company.

From my point of view, it is diffi­cult, especi­al­ly in medium-sized compa­nies, when old and new owners have opera­tio­nal respon­si­bi­li­ty in paral­lel for several years. This usual­ly leads to conflicts, which usual­ly have a negati­ve impact on the company’s development.

How sensi­ble is it to consult an advisor for the sale of IT compa­nies? From what size of compa­ny is this stron­gly recommended? 

Basical­ly, there are a number of tax and legal issues to be clari­fied that requi­re special advice.

In additi­on, there are three main advan­ta­ges to engaging an advisor when selling a business:

  • Maintai­ning anony­mi­ty: By invol­ving a consul­tant, the anony­mi­ty of the seller is preser­ved. In most cases, the sale of a compa­ny is a top-secret project, so it must be imple­men­ted with parti­cu­lar care and discre­ti­on. Other­wi­se it could unsett­le employees, suppli­ers and even custo­mers. Compe­ti­tors often exploit this situa­ti­on immedia­te­ly. In doing so, they weaken the company’s positi­on in the long term. A consul­tant can covert­ly sound out the market for interes­ted parties without the compe­ti­ti­on immedia­te­ly finding out about the plans. This makes an advisor invaluable for a compa­ny that is ready to sell.
  • Time and cost savings: An advisor can present a compa­ny offer to a large number of poten­ti­al interes­ted parties in a very short time. This dispro­por­tio­na­te increase in contacts signi­fi­cant­ly increa­ses the proba­bi­li­ty of success of a business sale. It thus reduces the time and costs invol­ved in searching for and identi­fy­ing poten­ti­al interes­ted parties.
  • Process control and negotia­ti­on facili­ta­ti­on: Other advan­ta­ges of being accom­pa­nied by a consul­tant with practi­cal experi­ence are sensi­ble process control and goal-orien­ted discus­sion. A good advisor takes on the role of modera­tor and addres­ses the important emotio­nal needs of buyer and seller. Especi­al­ly in medium-sized compa­nies, the “trans­la­ti­on work” between the parties should not be undere­sti­ma­ted: Without transac­tion experi­ence, no buyer should take on this task alone. Becau­se the risk of expen­si­ve mista­kes and time delays increa­ses significantly.

The inter­view is the long versi­on of the background inter­view by Ingo Claus with iBusi­ness. The special: “How to get the most out. When inter­net entre­pre­neurs want to sell” can be found here (regis­tra­ti­on required).

Tips for further reading:

Free webinar on business succession

Inter­view: Prepa­ring the succes­si­on within the family well

Comment: Unresol­ved compa­ny succes­si­ons endan­ger our prosperity

The costs of a business succes­si­on or an M&A project

How do you recog­ni­se a reputa­ble business sale advisor?

Buying a compa­ny - the first conver­sa­ti­on is crucial

Areas of conflict in the sale of a company

The general condi­ti­ons for successful compa­ny succes­si­ons are coming to a head

Better integra­ti­on of female compa­ny successors!

KfW - Analy­sis: Compa­ny succes­si­on a burning issue in SMEs

 


Is it current­ly worth selling one’s own compa­ny?

In the overall econo­my, the general condi­ti­ons for a business succes­si­on are extra­or­di­na­ri­ly good at the moment: the low interest rates make for a favoura­ble finan­cing environment.

What are the most common reasons for selling IT compa­nies?

These reasons for a sale can be very diffe­rent. One of the main reasons for a compa­ny sale of IT compa­nies is to secure the growth of the compa­ny. Especi­al­ly the sale to a strate­gic inves­tor creates syner­gies or brings the neces­sa­ry know-how to create an additio­nal compe­ti­ti­ve advantage.

Should the old boss stay with the compa­ny after the sale?

Often, the know-how and network of the former boss still benefit the success of the compa­ny after the sale. This is often the case, especi­al­ly in growth-orien­ted compa­nies with invest­ment needs. If the compa­ny is heavi­ly depen­dent on the perso­na­li­ty of the owner, long-term employ­ment can also make sense. In this case, 2 favoura­ble soluti­ons are parti­cu­lar­ly recom­men­ded: The appoint­ment of an adviso­ry board or via consul­tancy contracts. However, the old boss should not be too invol­ved in the opera­ti­ve business. This usual­ly leads to paraly­sing conflicts.