Contributed image-KERN-Earn-Out-at-the-company-sale

Earn out when selling a company

When selling a compa­ny, the earn-out clause is a decisi­ve factor in achie­ving a fair and forward-looking purcha­se price.

How does an earn-out work? An earn out Divides the purcha­se price into a fixed and a varia­ble compo­nent The varia­ble porti­on is only paid after the transac­tion has been comple­ted and is based on the company’s future perfor­mance. This mecha­nism is often used, if there are uncer­tain­ties about the true value of the compa­ny or if the seller wishes to remain invol­ved in the future develo­p­ment of the company.

Earn-out clauses can be found in compa­ny purcha­se agree­ments. They are part of the purcha­se price clause in the Compa­ny sale. An Earn Out Divides the purcha­se price into a fixed and a varia­ble compo­nent on.

You don’t have much time to read? A compact summa­ry of every­thing you need to know about Earn Out:

  • Earn out clauses are used when the parties to the contract have Diffe­rent estima­tes of the purcha­se price possess.

  • What are earn-out payments? Part of the purcha­se price will be paid at a later date.

  • The outstan­ding payment is usual­ly Depen­dent on econo­mic develo­p­ments of the business made.

  • There are no legal restric­tions on the earn-out payment, so there is room for manoeuvre.

  • An earn out clause also carri­es risks, such as the delibe­ra­te manipu­la­ti­on of corpo­ra­te develo­p­ment with the aim of lower payments.

Earn Out Definition

A Earn Out is a Downstream, additio­nal and often varia­ble purcha­se price compo­nent. The earn-out payment is linked to an uncer­tain future event. This event is usual­ly earnings or the future earnings perfor­mance of the company.

Earn Out German: The term “earn out” can be trans­la­ted into German as “subse­quent purcha­se price payment” or “perfor­mance-related purcha­se price payment”.

Earn-out clause in the acqui­si­ti­on of a company

Through an earn-out clause in the Compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment Buyer and seller agree that not the full price, but only a certain part is paid upon trans­fer of the shares. Such clauses are parti­cu­lar­ly important in complex Corpo­ra­te transac­tions This is common in cases where the future develo­p­ment of the compa­ny and thus the final value of the compa­ny are not clear­ly known at the time of sale. The other part of the purcha­se price is Compa­ny acqui­si­ti­on settled later.

Earn Out example

To illus­tra­te the appli­ca­ti­on of an earn-out arran­ge­ment, consider the follo­wing examp­le: A compa­ny is sold for a price of €2 milli­on. The seller and the buyer agree that 1.5 milli­on euros will be paid immedia­te­ly and the remai­ning 500,000 euros as an earn-out depen­ding on the achie­ve­ment of certain sales targets in the next finan­cial year. If the compa­ny achie­ves or exceeds the defined sales targets, the earn-out amount is paid out in full. If the compa­ny fails to meet these targets, the earn-out amount is reduced accor­din­gly or cancel­led altogether.

Compa­ny purcha­se agreement

A compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment is a special form of purcha­se agree­ment. This purcha­se agree­ment regula­tes the speci­fic condi­ti­ons and clauses that are relevant to the sale and purcha­se of a compa­ny or an interest in a compa­ny. The compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment is a Econo­mic and legal transac­tionA transac­tion in which a compa­ny or an interest in a compa­ny is trans­fer­red to the buyer either in whole or in part.

One of the most important aspects of a Compa­ny sale proce­du­re is the Agree­ment of the purcha­se price based on the valua­ti­on of the compa­ny.

Are you looking for a suita­ble buyer for your succes­si­on? Take advan­ta­ge of our compre­hen­si­ve network.

Earn Out Agreement

In additi­on to the classic earn-out clauses, there are more speci­fic earn-out models that are tailo­red to the indivi­du­al needs of the contrac­ting parties.

What is an earn-out model? An earn-out model is a speci­fic agree­ment within a compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment that defines exact­ly how the earn-out is struc­tu­red. It deter­mi­nes the condi­ti­ons for additio­nal payments, such as the achie­ve­ment of certain finan­cial targets or milesto­nes that the compa­ny must fulfil after the takeover.

In additi­on to the classic earn-out clauses, there are more speci­fic agree­ments that are tailo­red to the indivi­du­al needs of the contrac­ting parties. These can take a varie­ty of forms and often include special crite­ria that go beyond the usual finan­cial indica­tors. Examp­les include the achie­ve­ment of strate­gic goals or the successful integra­ti­on of certain business areas after the takeover. These custo­mi­sed agree­ments allow for a more precise adjus­t­ment to the speci­fic circum­s­tances and objec­ti­ves of the parties invol­ved, which can contri­bu­te to a fairer and more target-orien­ted purcha­se price.

When does an earn out scheme come into play?

An earn out scheme can be used when Buyer and seller have diffe­rent ideas about the purcha­se price of the compa­ny have.

KERN-Grafik-Häufige-Gründe-für-der-Einsatz-einer-Earn-Out-Regelung

These devia­ting purcha­se price expec­ta­ti­ons can have the follo­wing causes:

Diffe­rent assess­ment of the future earnings or econo­mic develo­p­ment of the company

The valua­ti­on of a compa­ny is usual­ly based on the capita­li­sed earnings value method accor­ding to the IDWS1 standard. In the skilled crafts sector, the AWH method also plays a role. Since these are forecasts for the future, they can be asses­sed differ­ent­ly by the seller and the buyer. In additi­on, there may be other uncer­tain­ty factors.

This leads to the seller and buyer having a diffe­rent idea of the purcha­se price. Through an earn-out arran­ge­ment, a compro­mi­se can be found here that is fair to both parties. Part of the purcha­se price is shifted to the future develo­p­ment of the compa­ny after the takeover.

Finan­cing the purcha­se price

In some cases, the buyer may not be able to raise the full purcha­se price by the time the shares are trans­fer­red. Even then, an earn-out arran­ge­ment can be advan­ta­ge­ous, as the purcha­ser can only pay the remain­der of the purcha­se price if the company’s earnings develop positively. must.

Other diffe­ren­ces

Also, if there are other diffe­ren­ces in the valua­ti­on of the compa­ny, such as in the inter­pre­ta­ti­on of certain risks, an earn out arran­ge­ment can lead to the elimi­na­ti­on of the conflict.

An earn-out can thus be a possi­ble and also the only compro­mi­se in order to satis­fy both parties and to achie­ve an Prevent failure of the entire transac­tion.

Turnaround situa­tions

If a compa­ny is in crisis, it can lead to insol­ven­cy or result in the liqui­da­ti­on of the compa­ny. However, there is also the Possi­bi­li­ty of a turnaround by the M&A process (Mergers and Acqui­si­ti­ons). An investor/buyer belie­ves in the future when concre­te changes are imple­men­ted with him.

In a turnaround, the company’s weak points are analy­sed and it is brought back into the profit zone as quick­ly as possi­ble. With an inves­tor before, or more precis­e­ly during such a phase, the compa­ny gets several Strate­gies and options for finan­cial, opera­tio­nal and strate­gic restruc­tu­ring. Often, painful changes are easier to imple­ment with the help of a third party than with the previous struc­tures at the manage­ment or share­hol­der level.

Risk distri­bu­ti­on

The purcha­se price is one of the most important crite­ria in a compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment. Connec­ted with this is also the questi­on of the distri­bu­ti­on of risk between seller and buyer.

There are often several months between the signing of the compa­ny purcha­se agree­ment and the actual trans­fer of the company/shares (closing).

Overview chart on the duration of the M&A process

During this time, it may happen that the econo­mic situa­ti­on of the compa­ny has changed in such a waythat it influen­ces the value of the compa­ny. The expec­ted develo­p­ment after the closing also affects the agreed purcha­se price, which can also have an impact on the value of the company.

These possi­ble, value-influen­cing changes are associa­ted with a corre­spon­ding risk. Of course, neither the buyer nor the seller wants to bear this risk in full. There­fo­re a Earn Out scheme a promi­sing way to spread the risk between both parties.

Diffe­rent price expec­ta­ti­ons of buyer and seller

Diffe­rent price expec­ta­ti­ons of seller and buyer are not uncom­mon. When valuing a compa­ny, the forecasts are decisi­ve. However, these also leave a lot of room for manoeu­vre and are often asses­sed differ­ent­ly by the buyer and the seller. The Seller usual­ly sees develo­p­ments more positively than the buyer and would thus like to agree on a higher purcha­se price.

Another reason for the diffe­rent price expec­ta­ti­ons is an infor­ma­ti­on asymme­try between seller and buyer. The seller has usual­ly known his compa­ny for many years, the buyer looks at it more as an outsi­der. This leads to a Diffe­rent risk assess­ment between seller and buyer and, as a result, to diffe­rent purcha­se price expectations.

An earn-out arran­ge­ment can help to resol­ve these diffe­ren­ces. However, there are no speci­fi­ca­ti­ons for earn-out regula­ti­ons and both parties are free to design this regula­ti­on. This often makes the contrac­tu­al rules very complex and if the wording is unclear, earn-out clauses in parti­cu­lar can lead to dispu­tes afterwards.

Distinc­tion from the vendor loan

Distinction between earn-out and vendor loan for M&A financing

With a Vendor Loan The seller defers a part of the purcha­se price to the buyer by means of a so-called Seller loan. Part of the purcha­se price is thus paid upon takeover, the rest of the purcha­se price is offset as a loan. The seller thus assumes an exten­ded risk. After all, he often lags behind the finan­cing banks in terms of security.

If the buyer goes bankrupt, the seller often bears the full risk for his loan. 

In the case of a seller’s loan, the purcha­se price for the compa­ny may be due immedia­te­ly and at the same time a porti­on is defer­red by the seller. In contrast, with an earn-out, the varia­ble part of the purcha­se price is only due later and also only if the compa­ny develo­ps positively. In this case, both then bear the risk and both are of course interes­ted in the positi­ve develo­p­ment of the compa­ny.

Option right

For a high level of securi­ty for the seller, in rare cases the contracts may stipu­la­te an option right for the seller in the earn-out clauses. The seller then has the option right during the entire term of the earn-out scheme, to draw a possi­ble basic share of the flexi­ble shares and have it paid out. However, this is then deter­mi­ned by concre­te charac­te­ristics and is legal­ly compli­ca­ted to imple­ment in practice.

Earn out model

Classic design

In the classi­cal form, it is mainly a matter of recor­ding the econo­mic success of the compa­ny. The purcha­se price can then be deter­mi­ned accor­ding to this recor­ding. In order to then final­ly deter­mi­ne whether and in what amount an earn-out amount arises, it is neces­sa­ry from the defined corner points and calcu­la­ti­ons depen­ding on.

A seller will usual­ly like to measu­re success by turno­ver. A buyer, on the other hand, is more likely to measu­re opera­ting profit, becau­se that is the varia­ble that is parti­cu­lar­ly important to him. It is advisa­ble if both sides also agree on clear rules for the measu­re­ment parame­ter. For examp­le, turno­ver may not be shifted or costs artifi­ci­al­ly increased.

Surplus clause or debtor warrant

This is a special case of an earn-out clause: the buyer under­ta­kes to make an earn-out payment in the event of a sale of the compa­ny before the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the agreed arrangements.

Durati­on

Example chart Timeline from agreement to completion of an earn-out payment

The earn out period deter­mi­nes the durati­on of the scheme. Usual­ly an earn out period of 2 to 3 years, maximum 5 years is set. With a longer durati­on, or longer forecasts, the proba­bi­li­ty of occur­rence becomes lower and lower.. Too many factors play a role in the company’s develo­p­ment that cannot be taken into account in advan­ce. In additi­on, the influence of the new owner on the compa­ny and its develo­p­ment increa­ses over the years.

Share of the purcha­se price

The share of the purcha­se price to be paid upon trans­fer of the business is fixed. The subse­quent share is varia­ble and depends on the success of the business. The amount of the fixed purcha­se price is left up to the seller and the buyer. The same appli­es to the varia­ble porti­on. Since it is No legal­ly requi­red earn-out clauses only the seller and the buyer have to come to an agreement.

Define calcu­la­ti­on basis

The Basis for the earn-out calcu­la­ti­on is as a rule the EBITDA (the profit resul­ting from the ordina­ry activi­ties of a compa­ny, exclu­ding interest, taxes, depre­cia­ti­on, amorti­sa­ti­on and other finan­cial expenses).

Further­mo­re, the income state­ment ratios such as EBIT (Earnings before interest and taxes)turno­ver or net profit for the year.

Further­mo­re, some positi­ons agreed upon during the negotia­ti­ons should be cleared up in order to exclude poten­ti­al disputes.

Finan­cial due diligence can help deter­mi­ne EBITDA and show where adjus­t­ments may need to be made.

The adjus­t­ments have the aim of To reflect the origi­nal perfor­mance of the compa­ny and thus minimi­se the diffe­rent value percep­ti­ons of seller and buyer.

Example chart Timeline from agreement to completion of an earn-out payment

Finan­cial Due Diligence

Finan­cial due diligence is inten­ded to help deter­mi­ne the value of the compa­ny by Compa­ny-speci­fic issues, certain legal dispu­tes, warran­ty issues, employee sever­ance payments, site closures or the loss of certain custo­mers and orders reveals.

It also takes into account extra­or­di­na­ry income and expen­ses of the company.

Finan­cial due diligence can be carri­ed out by both the seller and the buyer and usual­ly consists of three parts: 

  1. the Analy­sis of the past,
  2. the analy­sis of corpo­ra­te planning,
  3. and the revised planning based on own Due Diligence Findings.

Clari­fi­ca­ti­on of the reference value through adjus­t­ment of positions

The reference figures, such as the P&L ratios, can be checked exten­si­ve­ly through finan­cial due diligence. This ensures that any short­co­mings can be uncover­ed. This allows the seller to adjust these positi­ons. The Reference values become more precise as a result and have a corre­spon­ding influence on the purcha­se price.

Accoun­ting standards

The appli­ca­ble accoun­ting standards are just as important as the exact defini­ti­on and speci­fi­ca­ti­on of the benchmarks.

The Accoun­ting standards should be estab­lished for the entire calcu­la­ti­on period and appli­ed. They should not devia­te from the period under review of the finan­cial due diligence.

If the accoun­ting standards change in the calcu­la­ti­on period, this must be correc­ted for the purcha­se price adjustment.

What arran­ge­ments need to be made?

The design of earn-out clauses is not subject to any speci­fi­ca­ti­ons. Sellers and buyers are there­fo­re free to design their own clauses, but should consider a number of factors.

The follo­wing points and dates would have to be defined and regula­ted without fail so that there are no dispu­tes between the two parties later on.

Chart Important regulations for earn-out

Dangers

In an earn out scheme, the seller runs the risk of abuse. Since the compa­ny has alrea­dy been econo­mic­al­ly and legal­ly trans­fer­red to the buyer, he has the possi­bi­li­ty to signi­fi­cant­ly influence the basis of assess­ment for the earn-out arrangements.

KERN-Earn-Out-Consulting-Request
Map with KERN locations

Advan­ta­ges and disad­van­ta­ges from the point of view of seller and buyer

Advan­ta­ges for the seller:

The seller can achie­ve an overall higher purcha­se price through an earn out arrangement.




If the key figures are even higher than planned and additio­nal payments have been agreed, the total purcha­se price can be signi­fi­cant­ly higher.

Disad­van­ta­ges for the seller:

Since the seller no longer has any influence on the develo­p­ment of the compa­ny, the buyer can inhibit the econo­mic success so that the compa­ny cannot show any econo­mic growth at the given time.

The seller bears the credit risk for the buyer, as the downstream purcha­se price is subor­di­na­ted. However, this risk can be secured by a corre­spon­ding colla­te­ral or finan­cing commit­ment of the earn-out.

Advan­ta­ges for the buyer:



If the key figures are even higher than planned and additio­nal payments have been agreed, the total purcha­se price can be signi­fi­cant­ly higher.

Disad­van­ta­ges for the buyer:

An earn-out arran­ge­ment does not allow the buyer to apply a fixed risk discount in the valua­ti­on of the compa­ny and thus reduce the purcha­se price.

He may have restric­tions on his freedom of action due to the earn out clauses, which may be detri­men­tal to the company.

If you as a buyer have not yet found an interes­t­ing proper­ty to buy, we will be happy to help you with our years of experience.

Seller loan as an alternative

If the buyer and seller agree in princi­ple on the purcha­se price and the reason for the earn out provi­si­on is only that the buyer is not able to pay the full purcha­se price at the time of the purcha­se, an alter­na­ti­ve should be considered.

This Alter­na­ti­ve may be a vendor loan. In this case, the seller defers part of the purcha­se price to the buyer.

Taxes

When the seller sells his business, he genera­tes a profit at the time of trans­fer of owner­ship to the buyer. It does not matter when the purcha­se price is due or actual­ly recei­ved by the seller. This means that the Profit from the sale of the compa­ny to be taxed in full upon comple­ti­on of the transac­tion is. An excep­ti­on are very diffe­ren­tia­ted regula­ti­ons in the contract.

When does the seller have to pay tax on the earn-out payments? Taxati­on of earn-out payments is general­ly recog­nis­ed at the time of actual payment. This means that the seller does not have to pay the taxes due on the earn-out until the earn-out payments are actual­ly made. This differs from the immedia­te taxati­on of the initi­al sales price and can offer tax advan­ta­ges, parti­cu­lar­ly if the earn-out payments are spread over several years.

However, a subse­quent reduc­tion of the purcha­se price can also have a retroac­ti­ve tax-reducing effect.

Conclu­si­on

An earn-out clause can be useful if the seller and buyer have diffe­rent price expec­ta­ti­ons. In this case, the earn-out provi­si­on can help to bridge the gap.

It should be borne in mind, however, that there are No legal requi­re­ments for an earn out clause and that this can be corre­spon­din­gly extensive.

In any case, care must be taken to ensure that the design of the earn-out scheme takes all important aspects into account. Only in this way can the Poten­ti­al for conflict between buyer and seller reduced and ensure that there are no dispu­tes in the future.