Employee infor­ma­ti­on when selling a compa­ny: When is the right time?

The timing of employee infor­ma­ti­on in the sale of a compa­ny plays a decisi­ve role. When is the right time to inform the manage­ment level and the entire workforce? How should the infor­ma­ti­on be provided?

If the manage­ment level of the compa­ny is infor­med too late, this may well lead to the dismis­sal of demoti­va­ted and insecu­re employees. For the compa­ny buyer, the reten­ti­on of the manage­ment level is an asset that should not be undere­sti­ma­ted, especi­al­ly if the profes­sio­nal exper­ti­se is parti­cu­lar­ly important for the further develo­p­ment of the compa­ny. There­fo­re, it must be conside­red in good time how and when the execu­ti­ves can be included in the sales process.

Informing employees too early when selling a compa­ny can lead to failure

In this speci­fic case, a poten­ti­al buyer of a compa­ny concluded a compre­hen­si­ve LOI with the execu­tor of the decea­sed compa­ny owner. As part of the planned due diligence, various documents were reques­ted to exami­ne the compa­ny. In the process, the estate adminis­tra­tor and the company’s tax advisor also included the senior employees. In this project, staff were infor­med about the sale of the compa­ny at a very early stage. In the course of the exami­na­ti­on process, some employees develo­ped a life of their own that was dange­rous for the sales process. Inten­si­ve contacts from the past with key suppli­ers and custo­mers were used to develop their own interests. In the end, access to various documents and the possi­bi­li­ty to contact suppli­ers and custo­mers was denied.

Whether this is due to insecu­ri­ty, existen­ti­al fears or calcu­la­ti­on is diffi­cult to verify. The fact is, however, that especi­al­ly when the owner of a compa­ny sudden­ly dies, suppli­ers and custo­mers can quick­ly develop their own interests and instru­men­ta­li­se employees of the compa­ny concerned.

In the speci­fic case, some senior employees even spoke of a ‘Plan B’ that had alrea­dy been develo­ped. This ultim­ate­ly led to a damaged basis of trust between the poten­ti­al buyer and the manage­ment level of the company.

Profes­sio­nal counsel­ling avoids conflicts

A succes­si­on advisor with transac­tion experi­ence could have acted as a media­tor here to maintain the neces­sa­ry confi­den­tia­li­ty between all parties and coordi­na­te the entire process of selling the business. The interests and needs of the employees could also have been recog­nis­ed and taken into account in time within the frame­work of a business mediation.

It requi­res considera­ble tact, both on the part of the estate adminis­tra­tor and the prospec­ti­ve buyer, to find out when and to what extent the manage­ment level of the compa­ny to be taken over will be invol­ved in the ongoing process. Choosing the right time to inform employees in the sale of a compa­ny is there­fo­re criti­cal to success.

In the case descri­bed, the planned compa­ny acqui­si­ti­on ultim­ate­ly failed becau­se the managers in parti­cu­lar were not invol­ved in the planned sale of the compa­ny to a poten­ti­al buyer in a timely and goal-orien­ted manner.

What remains are only losers, both the employees and the managers, becau­se the sales process has to be comple­te­ly restar­ted. The heirs of the decea­sed compa­ny owner also have to live with the uncer­tain­ty of now finding a new buyer. The prospec­ti­ve buyer has inves­ted valuable time - ultim­ate­ly for nothing.

Many experts from K.E.R.N ? The succes­si­on specia­lists are trained business media­tors or have acqui­red decades of their own experi­ence with succes­si­on proces­ses in medium-sized businesses.

Tips for further reading:

Prepa­ring for business succes­si­on - 3 practi­cal tips

Family founda­ti­on as succes­si­on solution

Advice traps in the process of business succession

Comment: Unresol­ved compa­ny succes­si­ons endan­ger our prosperity

Free webinars on business succession