Duty of disclo­sure in the sale of a company

It is important to obser­ve the duties of disclo­sure in the sale of a business: For examp­le, a seller should provi­de infor­ma­ti­on about the possi­ble depar­tu­re of an employee. Failure to do so may result in damages or rever­sal of the transaction.

Dr Silja Maul, a lawyer from Mannheim, descri­bes at www.anwalt.de the conse­quen­ces of the ruling of the Karls­ru­he Higher Regio­nal Court (29 August 2011, 8 O 241/10) on possi­ble duties of disclo­sure of a selling entre­pre­neur. Failure to comply with the duties of disclo­sure in the sale of a business can have drama­tic finan­cial conse­quen­ces for a seller.

Accor­ding to the case law of the highest courts, the seller has a duty to disclo­se infor­ma­ti­on during contract negotia­ti­ons if the buyer could reason­ab­ly expect to be infor­med of facts that are obvious­ly of decisi­ve importance for the forma­ti­on of the buyer’s will, which is affirm­ed, inter alia, in case of considera­ble econo­mic disad­van­ta­ges for the buyer (BGH NJW 2010, 3362).

Intra-compa­ny agree­ments are part of the duty of disclo­sure in the sale of a company

Accor­ding to the judge­ment of the OLG Karls­ru­he, these circum­s­tances also include the promi­se made by the subse­quent seller to an employee that he would become a co-partner. In the opini­on of the OLG, this circum­s­tance should have been disclo­sed during the sales negotia­ti­ons in the case at hand, since there was a risk that the depar­tu­re of the employee would lead to considera­ble losses in turno­ver, especi­al­ly since the speci­fic risk of the employee’s depar­tu­re was not part of the general entre­pre­neu­ri­al risk, but was due to a situa­ti­on created by the seller himself before the sale of the company.

Other­wi­se there is the threat of rever­sal or compen­sa­ti­on for damages

This ruling is likely to have a signi­fi­cant impact on any business succes­si­on project: This is becau­se the seller must disclo­se the circum­s­tances that cause an important employee to leave after the sale of the business. If this does not happen or is forgot­ten, the acqui­rer may be able to chall­enge the sale of the compa­ny or assert claims for compen­sa­ti­on in court.

There­fo­re, special atten­ti­on must be paid to such agree­ments in contract negotia­ti­ons: The loss of key employees can cause existen­ti­al diffi­cul­ties for smaller compa­nies in parti­cu­lar. If this employee has been promi­sed by the seller to parti­ci­pa­te as a co-partner, there may even be the possi­bi­li­ty of a rever­sal of the sale of the compa­ny. This can be preven­ted if the seller follows his duties of disclo­sure very close­ly when selling the company.

Tips for further reading:

The costs of a business succes­si­on or an M&A project

How do you find reputa­ble business sale advisors?

Inter­view: Prepa­ring the succes­si­on within the family well

With these 3 tips your search for a compa­ny will be successful

Requi­re­ments for media­tors in transactions

Compa­ny succes­si­on: Finan­cing is often the sticking point

Source: www.anwalt.de