Two fingers pointing at each other and almost touching

The media­tor in the sale of a company

A media­tor can play an important role in the sale of a compa­ny. For this reason, the term “deal media­ti­on” has become estab­lished among M&A bouti­ques and consul­tanci­es in recent years. The background is the use of media­ti­on for the purpo­se of a sustainable transac­tion. This artic­le deals with the possi­ble areas of appli­ca­ti­on of a media­tor in the transac­tion process.

Classic use

The media­tor can, in the context of Corpo­ra­te transac­tions can be used in two ways. On the one hand, such a modera­tor can be used in the classic way, i.e. in the sense of the media­ti­on process. This means that a conflict has alrea­dy arisen between the parties invol­ved in the M&A process. The parties do not neces­s­a­ri­ly have to be just the buyer and the seller. Conflicts regular­ly arise between M&A advisors, such as M&A process managers, tax advisors, auditors, lawyers and clients or even among themselves.

Preven­ti­ve use

On the other hand, the media­tor can also be used preven­tively. This is parti­cu­lar­ly useful in the case of compa­ny acqui­si­ti­ons and sales.

Who is the client?

In this context, one of the key questi­ons in the use of a media­tor aims at how and by whom the media­tor is invol­ved in the process. For the media­tor, the assign­ment can be a clever one, such as in intra-compa­ny mediations.

M&A bouti­ques and consultancies

This always comes into conside­ra­ti­on when the M&A boutique commis­sio­ned with the sale or purcha­se, as smaller M&A adviso­ry firms are often called, or the commis­sio­ned advisor wants to secure the transac­tion execu­ti­on. The media­tor is there­fo­re appoin­ted by the M&A litig­ant. It is there­fo­re a kind of ‘clever case’.

Buyer and seller

Do the two main parties, buyer and seller, have a common under­stan­ding of the Compa­ny succes­si­on media­ti­on and see the conflict in which they find themsel­ves as part of an M&A process as an oppor­tu­ni­ty to conclude a purcha­se agree­ment, the media­tor can be commis­sio­ned direct­ly by these two parties.

Part of the transac­tion process

The third option is to have the media­tor schedu­led and priced in from the begin­ning of the process by the M&A consul­tancy firm or the M&A advisor commis­sio­ned to carry out the transac­tion. This can be done preven­tively or on call. In this case, buyers and sellers know the possi­bi­li­ties for using a media­tor from the begin­ning of the process and can include the media­tor in their schedule.

Requi­re­ments for the mediator

The demands on a media­tor depend on the situa­ti­on (the case) and the parties invol­ved. In additi­on, there are diffe­rent requi­re­ments for the media­tor depen­ding on the conflict topic. This may, for examp­le, be due to a certain sector or neces­sa­ry exper­ti­se. However, there are a few requi­re­ments that a media­tor must basical­ly fulfil in order to be able to conduct a media­ti­on successful­ly. Media­ti­on cannot only be descri­bed as successful if the parties to the conflict reach an agree­ment. Rather, the defini­ti­on of a successful media­ti­on depends on the attitu­de of the media­tor. Thus, a media­tor may well be conside­red to have conduc­ted a successful media­ti­on if he or she has succee­ded in leading the process and thus has process sovereig­n­ty in the mediation.

The Media­ti­on Act

The Media­ti­on Act stipu­la­tes a few requi­re­ments of a funda­men­tal nature. It states direct­ly in §1 (2) that “a media­tor is an indepen­dent and neutral person without decis­i­on-making autho­ri­ty who guides the parties through media­ti­on”. The first requi­re­ments for a media­tor are derived from this. The media­tor must be impar­ti­al and must be able to lead the process. Further­mo­re, §2 para. 3 Media­ti­onsG states that “he or she shall promo­te commu­ni­ca­ti­on between the parties…”. Well-develo­ped commu­ni­ca­ti­ve skills are there­fo­re a further requi­re­ment of the Media­ti­on Act.

The Media­ti­on Act also ensures that a media­tor must have under­go­ne appro­pria­te training and also recei­ve regular further training in this area.

Other skills

Away from the media­ti­on law, media­tors join the ranks of counsell­ors and trainers, who should demons­tra­te compe­ten­ces in the areas of perso­na­li­ty, profes­sio­nal and field compe­ten­ces as quali­ty requirements.

The profes­sio­nal compe­tence is impar­ted through the training alrea­dy prescri­bed in the Media­ti­on Act and is often enriched with knowledge from commu­ni­ca­ti­on, modera­ti­on and psycho­lo­gy. The profes­sio­nal and field compe­ten­ces are analy­sed in detail in the follo­wing section.

The decisi­ve and funda­men­tal requi­re­ment for a media­tor is not only trained techni­que, but above all attitu­de. Media­tors should there­fo­re not be exclu­si­ve­ly theore­ti­ci­ans, but rather have practi­cal and life experi­ence so that they are percei­ved by the media­tors as respec­ted autho­ri­ties. Soft skills such as patience, humour, empathy, authen­ti­ci­ty and creati­vi­ty are also required.

In the next artic­le, we will take a closer look at the special requi­re­ments of a media­tor in corpo­ra­te transactions.

Tips for further reading:

Areas of conflict in the sale of a company

Comment: Unresol­ved compa­ny succes­si­ons endan­ger our prosperity

Advice traps in the process of business succession

Selling a business: Why a pure success fee makes it diffi­cult to provi­de serious advice

Selling a compa­ny in the IT industry

The 5 most important contents of an entre­pre­neu­ri­al emergen­cy kit